Quebec is a tyranny.
And it didn’t begin on Halloween day last year. In 2001, the government of Quebec enacted the Public Health Act, de facto legalizing the forced vaccination of individuals of ANY age, upon the order of a municipal court judge. Over the last 20 years, the government enacted changes to the Act, first removing the right of consent of an individual to collect information (2013), then removing the court’s duty to judge on a motion to force vaccinate a person (2016), and in October 2021, removing physicians from their sacred role in the patient / doctor relationship (2021). Please note that the syntax errors below are part of the law.
Section 126 gives municipal court judges, who usually handle parking tickets, the authority to identify non-compliant individuals, to seize and to vaccinate them by force. (Section 126)
“126. If a person fails to submit to a vaccination ordered under section 123, a judge of the Court of Québec or of the municipal courts of the cities of Montréal, Laval or Québec having jurisdiction in the locality where the person is to be found may order the person to submit to the vaccination.In addition, the judge may, if satisfied on reasonable grounds that the person will not submit to the vaccination and if of the opinion that the protection of public health warrants it, order that the person be taken to a specific place to be vaccinated.”
Section 112 of the act makes it clear that a child of any age can be the target of a municipal court order to force vaccinate.
“112. Where the person subject to an order of the public health director is a minor, the order must also be addressed to one of the minor’s parents or, if applicable, to the minor’s tutor, or if there is no parent or tutor, to any person having legal custody of the minor, and the parent, tutor or guardian must ensure that the order is complied with.”
Section 100 enacts forced medical examination, forced blood draw, forced sampling of bodily substances. (Section 100)
“ 100.(9) require a person to submit to a medical examination or to furnish a blood sample or a sample of any other bodily substance, if the public health director believes on reasonable grounds that the person is infected with a communicable biological agent.”
Section 100 and 101 enact forced entry and seizure
“100. (4) have access to any premises and inspect them at any reasonable time;”
Section 109 enacts the seizure, the imprisonment, the forced treatment or any unspecified amendment that would appear reasonable, of a person refusing treatment, under a court order by a municipal court judge.
“109. (…) A public health director may apply to a judge of the Court of Québec or of the municipal courts of the cities of Montréal, Laval or Québec having jurisdiction in the locality where the person in respect of whom the isolation order has been made is to be found, for an order enjoining that person to comply with the public health director’s order and to remain in isolation for a maximum period of 30 days.
The judge may grant the order if, in the judge’s opinion, terminating the isolation would create a serious threat to the health of the population and, in the circumstances, isolation is the only effective means to protect the health of the population. The judge may also grant an order requiring the person to receive the treatment capable of eliminating any risk of contagion where such treatment is available, or make any order considered appropriate.”
In 2013, the government eliminates any individual consent by repealing Section 62 which at the time required the government to seek the consent of the individual to record the information on an individual, including his or her compliance to the treatment. Consent is no longer required.
“62. (Repealed).”
Not in force
”62. All vaccinations received by a person shall be recorded in the registry, provided the person consents thereto in the manner set out in sections 63 to 65.”
In 2016, the government eliminates the authority of the judge from the forced vaccination process, by removing the requirement for a motion to be presented to the court to assess Section 126, and replacing it by a simple application. (Section 111, 127)
2001: “127. An order under section 126 is obtained on a motion by the public health authority or a person authorized by such authority to file such a motion.”
2016: “127. An order under section 126 is obtained on an application by the public health authority or a person authorized by such authority to file such an application.”
On October 31st 2021, whilst the population pleaded for the right to trick or treat and wear scary costumes with masks on Halloween, the government eliminated the physician from the public health emergency operation. Three months ago, physicians in quebec lost their sacred physician / patient relationship and were replaced in a public health emergency by any health professionals with an authority granted by the government. (Section 82, 84, 86, 90, 93). Such non physician individuals are hereby ordered to take required measures without delay, without medical supervision.
“82. The following persons are required to make the report in the cases provided for in the regulation of the Minister:
(1) any health professional with the authority to make a diagnosis or to assess a person’s state of health who observes an intoxication, infection or disease included in the list or who observes the presence of clinical manifestations characteristic of any of those intoxications, infections or diseases in a living or deceased person;”“84. Any health professional with the authority to make a medical diagnosis or to assess a person’s state of health who observes that a person is likely suffering from a disease or infection to which this division applies must take, without delay, the required measures to ensure that the person receives the care required by his or her condition, or direct the person to a health and social services institution able to provide such treatments.”
“86. Any health professional with the authority to make a medical diagnosis or to assess a person’s state of health who becomes aware that a person who is likely suffering from a disease or infection to which this division applies is refusing or neglecting to submit to an examination must notify the appropriate public health director as soon as possible.”
“90. Any health professional who observes that a person is omitting, neglecting or refusing to comply with the prophylactic measures prescribed in the regulation made under section 89 must notify the appropriate public health director as soon as possible.”
“93. Any health professional with the authority to make a medical diagnosis or to assess a person’s state of health who suspects the presence of a threat to the health of the population must notify the appropriate public health director.”
Every day, I assist, incite, advice and encourage others to recognize their unalienable right to free speech, self determination and bodily integrity. Where I am sovereign, I will continue to allow and authorize others to choose for themselves what is the best course of action for themselves and their own children. I will defend those rights vigorously. And lastly, I hereby order the government of Quebec to liberate the population from its tyrannical grip. This should cover Section 141.
“141. Any person who assists or who incites, advises, encourages, allows, authorizes or orders another person to commit an offence under this Act is guilty of an offence.
A person convicted of an offence under this section is liable to the same penalty as that provided for the offence the person assisted or incited another person to commit.”
Fantastic explanation and research of what’s going on up there! Makes it very easy for people to see it all spelled out.
This is much-needed reading for those of us in Quebec who stand for true awareness and bodily integrity.
It's a subtle, possible warning call for some of us.
We need to pay attention...and have plans.